Press "Enter" to skip to content

Supreme Court to look at centre’s request to maintain adultery a criminal offense in armed forces



Earlier, the Centre had defended part 497 saying the sanctity of marriage should be protected.


  • The regulation making adultery a criminal offense was junked by the highest court docket in 2018
  • It was seen as reiterating stereotype whereby ladies lacked sexual company
  • The Centre argued again then that the regulation saved the sanctity of marriage

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court at this time agreed to look at the Central authorities’s request to maintain adultery a criminal offense within the armed forces. A bench of the highest court docket at this time requested the Chief Justice of India to arrange a five-judge structure bench to challenge clarification on the Centre’s plea.

In September 2018, a structure bench of the Supreme Court junked the 158-year regulation that made adultery a criminal offense in India. Under part 497 of the IPC, a person couldn’t be punished for an affair however not the girl, treating her as her husband’s property. The regulation espoused the sexual stereotypes that ascribe sexual company to males, and sexual passivity to ladies, and characterises males because the “seducers” and liable, criminally, whereas ladies are “seduced”, therefore the victims.

A petition had again then mentioned that by exonerating wives of adultery if finished with the consent of their husbands, it discriminates towards ladies, and quantities to “institutionalised discrimination”.

“Adultery cannot and should not be a crime,” then Chief Justice Dipak Misra had mentioned whereas delivering the decision in 2018. 

The Centre, in its plea submitted at this time, mentioned the 2018 verdict shouldn’t apply to armed forces the place personnel may be cashiered from service on the grounds of unbecoming conduct for committing adultery with a colleague’s spouse.

“The Supreme Court verdict (2018) on adultery may cause instability within the armed forces as defence personnel are expected to function in peculiar conditions and have to stay separated from their families for long duration,” the Centre’s plea at this time mentioned, fearing for self-discipline within the ranks.


“Discipline is the bedrock of the work culture in defence services and an essential ingredient for combat operations,” it mentioned.

Apparently, whereas delivering the 2018 verdict, the Supreme Court didn’t keep in mind or could not have been apprised of the peculiar service situations of the defence personnel. Besides, it might additionally not have thought of the truth that the framers of the Constitution had particularly authorised Parliament to abrogate their basic rights by way of Article 33.

Based on the Centre’s plea, the Supreme Court at this time issued a discover to the petitioner on whose plea adultery was decriminalised in 2018.

In the arguments main as much as the 2018 verdict, too, the Centre had defended part 497, saying the sanctity of marriage should be protected. The high court docket had then questioned how the regulation preserved the sanctity of marriage when the extra-marital affair did not invite punishment if the girl’s husband stood by her.

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: