Press "Enter" to skip to content

Premier League, NFL And Cricket Wrestle With Black Lives Matter Response

BLM in Premier League (Photo Credit: Reuters)

The English Premier League, the most well-liked home TV product in world sport, kicks off on Saturday having determined to interchange the Black Lives Matter emblem on gamers’ shirts with a “No Room for Racism” patch.

  • Reuters
  • Last Updated: September 11, 2020, 7:33 PM IST


The English Premier League, the most well-liked home TV product in world sport, kicks off on Saturday having determined to interchange the Black Lives Matter emblem on gamers’ shirts with a “No Room for Racism” patch.

The transfer is indicative of the fragile place many sports activities groups and organisations discover themselves in as they search to indicate assist for victims of injustice and ship a powerful anti-racism message whereas fearing a backlash from these against aligning with actions that some say have wider political goals.

On Thursday within the United States, the NFL restarted amid controversial scenes as some followers jeered throughout a second of silence “dedicated to the ongoing fight for equality in our country” earlier than the Kansas City Chiefs’ recreation in opposition to the Houston Texans.

While the Texans gamers stayed within the locker room for performances of “Lift Every Voice And Sing” and “The Star-Spangled Banner”, the Chiefs, the defending Super Bowl champions, stayed on the sector in the course of the anthems. One participant, Alex Okafor, knelt together with his fist raised.

The Miami Dolphins additionally introduced they might keep within the locker room in the course of the anthems for his or her recreation on Sunday.

When the Premier League restarted in June, the sight of all 22 gamers and the match officers taking the knee across the centre circle, with their names changed by “Black Lives Matter” on their shirts, despatched a robust message of assist within the wake of protests over the demise of George Floyd whereas in police custody in Minneapolis in May.

They then wore BLM badges on their shirts for the remaining matches, with the sport’s governing physique FIFA, which professes a ‘zero-tolerance’ method to the show of any political messages, popping out in assist.

In the months since, nonetheless, a divide has developed, with many individuals opposing what they see because the political goals of BLM whereas nonetheless asserting the necessity to protest in opposition to racism.

Premier League chief government Richard Masters just lately advised a British Parliamentary committee: “We are drawing a clear distinction between a moral cause and a political movement.”

Masters mentioned on Thursday the change of badge got here after discussions with gamers and would “build on the momentum created last season”.

“Discrimination in any form, anywhere, is wholly unacceptable and No Room For Racism makes our zero-tolerance stance clear,” Masters mentioned.

“We will not stand still on this important issue and we will continue to work with our clubs, players and partners to address all prejudiced behaviour.”

In one instance of the differing positions, former Wolves and QPR midfielder Karly Henry, who’s Black, voiced his opposition to the Premier League aligning with BLM in a tweeted earlier this summer time:

“A new inclusive and politically-neutral anti-racism movement to follow and get behind is much needed. Black people’s lives matter,” he wrote. “The divisive BlackLivesMatter organisation, however, DOES NOT!”


Also on Thursday, Michael Holding, the previous West Indies tempo bowler who’s now a extensively revered pundit, criticised the England, Australia and Pakistan groups for abandoning the gesture of “taking a knee” that England and West Indies gamers displayed confirmed of their sequence in July.

“I don’t care about the politics behind Black Lives Matter, I care about those three words: black lives matter,” Holding advised Sky Sports.

“If you don’t want to recognise the movement, then say that and don’t come up with lame excuses. You have to keep the awareness going.”

Australia captain Aaron Finch defined the groups’ determination by saying: “The education around it is more important than the protest. I have spoken to (England captain) Eoin (Morgan) and we are not going to do specific gestures like it has happened in the past.”

South Africa, which has its personal specific historical past of sporting racism, has been embroiled in a nationwide debate about whether or not “taking the knee” is suitable.

Its 1995 Rugby World Cup-winning captain Francois Pienaar was criticised by many followers and even former group mates when he took the knee at a cricket fixture.

There was additionally a backlash when eight South African members of the English Premiership rugby group Sale Sharks aspect didn’t take a knee, whereas another gamers did.

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: