Press "Enter" to skip to content

Jokes Apart | Johnny Depp, Amber Heard and the battle for misplaced glory

As the trial confirmed, each Johnny Depp and Amber Heard had been equally culpable of emotional and bodily violence, in addition to drug use

I first met Johnny Depp and Amber Heard at Karan Johar’s backyard celebration in Sainik Farms. It was the summer time of 2016. Okay, I’m making this up, however the lie has a degree. Just about each fan, incel, males’s rights activist and feminist with an emotional funding, on this case, behave like they knew each of them so intimately nicely, inside out and out of doors in. The Depp case has additionally divided feminists. The hardcore Johnny loyalists have made an exception right here in favour of their darling Depp.

One of the stupidest questions I’ve heard about this trial is: Why are individuals ? People have been within the lives of celebrities ever because the start of celebrities. The media follows. As Vinod Mehta used to say bluntly about salaciously controversial tales: Of course, I might have run it; it’s a rattling good story.

Besides, the real-life trial was the approaching collectively of two film genres: The courtroom drama and the bed room drama, a compelling mix of non-fiction and fiction. Elon Musk, who additionally briefly dated Heard, refused to testify, though he had this to say on Twitter, “I hope they move on. At their best, they are each incredible.” He went on so as to add that they need to spend no less than twelve hours a day within the Tesla workplace and fewer time within the bed room.

Actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard fought a bitter defamation trial within the US. A jury on 1 June discovered Depp and Heard defamed one another however sided much more strongly with the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star. AFP

The artwork of crying could be a useful gizmo in courtroom trials, particularly televised ones. In November final yr, Kyle Rittenhouse shed bucket-loads of tears and was acquitted on all counts. Rittenhouse was 17 when he shot lifeless two males and injured one other (all White; the killing wasn’t racially motivated) in the course of the Black Lives Matter protests and opportunistic rioting in Kenosha, Wisconsin. (Depp, Rittenhouse now says, is “fuelling” his drive to file defamation instances of his personal.) At the time, liberal commentators dismissed Rittenhouse’s crying as “resorting to a tried-and-true strategy for White men in trouble.” (Vox)

When Depp’s followers accused Amber Heard of shedding crocodile tears, the liberals mentioned that this was prime proof of misogynist scepticism and typecasting. In 2016, in one other case that was broadcast stay on information channels internationally, double amputee and paralympic athlete Oscar Pistorius sobbed uncontrollably (for days on finish) in a Pretoria courthouse, earlier than the Bladerunner was sentenced to 6 years in jail for killing his girlfriend.

As witnessed within the Depp-Heard trial, tremendous celebrities have legions of tremendous followers that do their very own factor, typically overshadowing what’s occurring contained in the courtroom. In Britney Spears’ conservatorship case involving her father, her acolytes, many from the LGBTQ neighborhood, gathered outdoors the courts for each listening to. They had been loud, festive and media-friendly. Fans work with a easy dichotomy of excellent and evil. They drum up social media help; in Depp’s case TikTok was the medium of alternative, exploding in a fireball of toeing-the-party-line creativity. These followers are those who actually create the story and direct it in a selected path—it’s not nearly being a “follower”.

Michael Jackson’s followers bathed London buses with posters and banners defending him from youngster abuse allegations. These had been later eliminated after a backlash by what the Economist known as, in one other context, “liberal mullahs”. When I made a passing point out of the kid abuse allegations in an almost-fan piece revealed on Jackson’s 10th loss of life anniversary, I used to be trolled by Jackson followers for a month.

I’m not a brilliant fan of anybody. That sort of blind religiosity doesn’t come simple to me, though I perceive it. I’ll take heed to somebody’s music even when she is a serial killer. I’m a easy client of artwork, not a cultural bureaucrat obsessive about scrubbing clear lit-fest levels and music streaming websites of an artist’s legacy. Let the courts determine if the people involved and affected determine to battle it out, as within the Depp and Heard case. This is a crucial level as a result of as I’ll argue, it was extra-judicial cancel tradition and its penalties that led to Depp submitting the defamation case within the first place.

Depp, Hollywood’s Salman Khan, is the final of the unhealthy boys in a sanitised period when unhealthy boys are frowned upon. There are those that imagine they need to be exorcised from life and artwork, that the best couple wearing kurta-pyjama ought to, earlier than having intercourse, alternate consent kinds, bow and say, “Pehle aap”. Depp is unhealthy in an outsized sort of means: He spent tens of millions blasting Hunter S Thomson’s ashes out of a cannon, owns just a few islands and no less than one village, performs guitar with Jeff Beck and is liable to passing out with ice cream on his crotch and potty in his denims. When Heard and Depp divorced, the joint assertion learn thus: “Our relationship was intensely passionate and at times volatile, but always bound by love.” As the trial confirmed, each events had been equally culpable of emotional and bodily violence, in addition to drug use.

The stay proceedings swung between judicial tedium and moments that had been prime time gold, principally due to Depp’s good lawyer, the 37-year-old Camille Vasquez. During one spherical of questioning, she just about nails Heard’s lie about imagined cocaine breakfasts. The {photograph} in query, one Heard despatched her “best friend”, is proven to be staged and manufactured, completely organized to perpetuate a delusion. Heard admits to snorting herself. The punkiest element that the layman acquired out of this was the presence of one thing known as a tampon applicator within the body. As Heard explains, it was her sister who taught Depp to make use of it to snort coke.

Jokes Apart Johnny Depp Amber Heard and the battle for lost glory

Amber Heard

Let’s now get right down to the brass tacks of the case, which was not a felony however a civil one, principally to do with defamation. For this, we have to return and skim the unique Washington Post op-ed in query, ostensibly written by Heard and which didn’t point out Depp by identify.

The op-ed was not authored by Heard, however by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a non-profit, to which Heard has pledged $3.5 million, half her divorce settlement quantity. The two are in a mutually useful relationship. In the ghost-written piece, Heard appears to be formulating a parallel profession, as a “public figure representing domestic abuse”. In two imprecise sentences, she says “I was exposed to abuse at a very young age”, and “I knew certain things early on, without ever having to be told.” The not so indirect reference to Depp comes within the line the place she says she “had the rare vantage point of seeing in real-time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse.”

As the Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple factors out in a current column, “Heard’s movie star conferred standing on the ACLU, which then leveraged her identify right into a Post op-ed. The byline was correct solely to the extent that the ACLU tried to craft a chunk per Heard’s spoken views.”  Wemple additional goes on to argue that the op-ed was “an assault against journalism. It embraced a clichéd op-ed design, that of deploying public figures to braid their personal experiences with policy prescriptions.”

While Heard and ACLU thought they might get away by not naming Depp, the reference to him, though nameless, had a fallout. Cancel tradition, which works unbiased of authorized conviction, meant that Depp misplaced out on work value tens of millions; the money-spinning franchises that he was earlier a part of refused to resume his contracts. He filed for defamation and gained.

***

Also Read

Amber Heard solely represents herself; her loss can’t be seen as the tip of a motion

Explained: Why Johnny Depp stays a ‘wife beater’ in UK however wins defamation case in US

Tracing Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial as formed by the darkish aspect of fandom

Amber Heard ‘completely can not’ pay $10 mn penalty to Johnny Depp: Lawyer

Of fan merch and help indicators: What the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial says about stan tradition

In Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial, lawyer Camille Vasquez takes centrestage

Amber Heard accuses Johnny Depp of sexually assaulting her with liquor bottle

***

Another fascinating aspect of this case has to do with Internet lynch mobs that focused Heard unfairly. Writing within the NYT, Jessica Bennett argues that “this is a good old-fashioned public pillorying — only memes have replaced the stones.” This may be very true however the MeToo motion too could be accused of this. An allegation on the Internet, a recounting of a spurious anecdote, typically unsigned, was sufficient to wreck careers and lives. At its peak, the MeToo motion in India grew to become a free-for-all, which was solely tempered by a crude, organically-evolving jungle legislation. When everybody’s good friend, colleague, boyfriend, husband and father stood accused of a sexual misdemeanour of various levels of seriousness, the motion started to fragment, every fragment attacking the opposite vociferously whereas defending their very own.

Which brings us to the query: Should we imagine all girls? As Chris Rock joked, “Believe all girls, besides Amber Heard.” Writing concerning the Depp-Heard saga for Vogue, Raven Smith argues, “It’s time to believe women — all women. It’s time to believe Heard.”

Taking a extra nuanced view, Jessica Bennett argues, “The trial seems to have exposed some of the rhetorical weaknesses of #MeToo. ‘Believe women’ for example — a phrase that was meant to underscore how rare it is for a woman to lie about her own abuse — had somehow morphed into ‘believe all women’, which left no room for the outlier.”

In a widely known case from 2014, Rolling Stone needed to retract a narrative headlined “A Rape on Campus”, by which a girl who recognized herself as Jackie had claimed that she was gang-raped throughout a fraternity initiation ritual. Like with the current case, there’s a Virginia connection. The police failed to search out any proof, whereas the University of Virginia fraternity, Phi Kappa Psi, introduced a defamation lawsuit, which Rolling Stone settled for $1.65 million. The Columbia Journalism Review known as the story “a mess — thinly sourced, full of erroneous assumptions, and plagued by gaping holes in the reporting.”

When a pupil in England in 1999, I as soon as noticed a programme known as Battered Men on the respectable terrestrial channel, Channel 4. A beefy man employed as a safety guard talked about home abuse by the hands of his accomplice, “I’ve had broken ribs, lots of cuts, bruises, black eye. Clumps of hair would be missing where she’d pulled it out. She’s done damage to the other parts of my body with the saucepans. Kidneys have been damaged, passed blood through the urine. When you love someone…you’d die for them.” Domestic violence is horrific and impacts each genders. Believe each.

Finally, a phrase concerning the jury system. Critics of the US judgement have pointed to the truth that within the UK Depp had misplaced an analogous libel swimsuit towards the Sun. Across the pond, the ruling was made by a person decide, with a supposedly distanced and legally sound method, whereas it’s been argued {that a} jury — particularly on this occasion — might be extra impressionable to and influenced by social media developments. But a system is a system; it’s an outdated debate in jurisprudence, which is why there are two conventional methods — respect them.

I’ve at all times felt that the jury system is extra prone to pure prejudices as a result of it makes judges of odd individuals who carry their innate prejudices into the courthouse. We have seen this in numerous instances the place harmless Black males have been falsely convicted by all White juries, and all-White juries have allowed White perpetrators to go scot free, like within the Rodney King case. And but, guilty the jury system for Depp’s ‘victory’ is a bit like Hillary Clinton asking for the electoral school system to be abolished after she misplaced, or Trump being in denial blaming authorized postal ballots for his loss.

What I disagree with is the sort of apocalyptic despair expressed by Raven Smith, though she says she doesn’t wish to despair, “I spend a lot of time wondering if everyone’s lost the plot — if the erosion of empathy we see online has rendered us so inherently unkind as a species that there’s no return.” The MeToo motion was a essential corrective and can proceed to be a robust pressure for change. Mobs on either side must reign of their natural tendencies. Shrink the hole between the poles, and you will note the seeds of empathy take root.

The author is the creator of ‘The Butterfly Generation’ and the editor of ‘House Spirit: Drinking in India’. Views expressed are private.

Read all of the Latest News, Trending NewsCricket News, Bollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News right here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: