Press "Enter" to skip to content

Indian-Origin Ex-Postmasters Win Stealing Scandal Case In UK

Seema Misra maintained her innocence within the case and fought a protracted battle for justice.


Indian-origin postal managers are amongst a bunch of 39 individuals who gained a Court of Appeal case within the UK on Friday that dismissed their convictions for allegedly stealing cash and false accounting following the set up of a brand new pc system in native publish places of work in a historic scandal relationship again a number of years.

These former sub-postmasters have been hit by a defective IT system, referred to as Horizon, that led to accusations of them of stealing funds from the UK’s Post Office Ltd.

In 2019, a High Court ruling had accepted a 57.8-million kilos settlement between lots of of claimants and the Post Office, with many then left to overturn their convictions. Among the group of 39 are the likes of Seema Misra and Vijay Parekh, who had maintained their innocence.

Ms Misra took over her publish workplace in Surrey in 2005 and was pregnant when she was wrongly handed a 15-month sentence 10 years in the past after being accused of stealing 75,000 kilos from her department.

“I would definitely have killed myself if I hadn’t been pregnant,” stated Ms Misra, a mom of two who hailed Friday’s Court of Appeal verdict as a “huge moment”.

Sub-postmasters like her had appealed their convictions on two grounds: that that they had been denied a good trial, and that the circumstances by which the prosecutions went forward “represents an affront to public conscience”.

In a ruling on the Royal Courts of Justice in London, a three-judge bench granted the enchantment on each grounds.

“Post Office Limited’s failures of investigation and disclosure were so egregious as to make the prosecution of any of the ”Horizon cases” an affront to the conscience of the court,” stated Lord Justice Timothy Holroyde, sitting with Justice Simon Picken and Justice Judith Farbey.

He stated the Post Office “knew there were serious issues about the reliability of Horizon” and had a “clear duty to investigate” the system”s defects.

The ruling means the previous postmasters may deliver new civil circumstances for malicious prosecution, which may imply the Post Office having to pay out extra in compensation.

“I am in no doubt about the human cost of the Post Office’s past failures and the deep pain that has been caused to people affected,” stated Post Office chief govt Nick Read.

“The quashing of historical convictions is a vital milestone in fully and properly addressing the past as I work to put right these wrongs as swiftly as possible and there must be compensation that reflects what has happened,” he stated.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which referred the sub-postmasters’ convictions to the Court of Appeal, termed it as “serious miscarriage of justice” which has had a devastating influence on these victims and their households.

“Every single one of these convictions has clearly had a profound and life-changing impact for those involved. The Post Office has rightly acknowledged the failures that led to these cases and conceded that the prosecutions were an abuse of process,” stated CCRC chair Helen Pitcher.

The controversial Horizon system, developed by the Japanese firm Fujitsu, was first rolled out in 1999 to some publish places of work for use for quite a lot of duties, together with accounting and stocktaking.

But it appeared to have vital bugs, which may trigger the system to misreport, typically involving massive sums as was the case within the case of those sub-postmasters.

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: