Press "Enter" to skip to content

Govt does sudden U-turn, buries retrospective tax: Rs 1.1-lakh-crore tax calls for nullified; Rs 8,100 crore to be refunded

The authorities has up to now recovered Rs 8,100 crore, invoking the controversial legislation, together with Rs 7,600 crore from Cairn Energy.

The authorities on Thursday put to relaxation its notorious 2012-born tax legislation that sought to retrospectively tax good points from oblique switch of Indian belongings. Though the transfer notionally includes a cutting down of New Delhi’s tax income ambitions by not less than Rs 1.1 lakh crore, any potential loss may very well be greater than offset as the choice may enhance the nation’s standing as an funding vacation spot, boosting its development potential and thereby tax receipts.

The shock tabling of the ‘The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2021’ by finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman within the Lok Sabha was hailed by trade and tax specialists. Government managers justified the choice that amounted to a U-turn from New Delhi’s public posturing on the problem, saying it was obligatory provided that greater than anything, the coverage focus ought to now be on making certain the nation’s ‘future growth’.

For the document, the Bill supplies for the withdrawal of tax demand made on “indirect transfer of Indian assets if the transaction was undertaken before May 28, 2012 (i.e. the day the retrospective tax legislation came into being)”. It can be proposed to refund the quantity paid in these instances with none curiosity thereon.

The authorities has up to now recovered Rs 8,100 crore, invoking the controversial legislation, together with Rs 7,600 crore from Cairn Energy.

The 2012 legislation had empowered the federal government of India to make tax calls for regarding cross-border offers all the best way again to 1962; the intent was to tax good points arising out of switch of shares of firms registered exterior India supplied such shares derived ‘substantial value’ from belongings positioned in India. The transfer has since been uncovered as a misadventure; the Hague Court dominated in opposition to in opposition to India within the two resultant high-profile instances involving telecom big Vodafone and UK-based Cairn Energy in September 2020 and December 2020 respectively.

In truth, the 2012 modification was meant to overturn a Supreme Court verdict that invalidated a retrospective-tax discover claims slapped on Vodafone in relation to its 2007 $11-billion acquisition of 67% stake within the Indian mobile-phone enterprise owned by Hutchison Whampoa.

In all, 17 instances of such retrospective taxation have been pursued by the Indian taxman whereas the evaluation course of is on in relation to a different two; the modest success on the income entrance has been greater than offset by the lack of fame as a predictable tax dispensation.

Finance secretary TV Somanathan instructed FE: “The move is part of the overall strategy of boosting the country’s future rate of growth and reaching our goal of a $5-trillion economy. This (amendment) is to make India an even more attractive destination for investment, both domestic and foreign, as we have a predictable and low-rate tax regime for corporates.” Somanathan stated: “We are consistent with earlier position– we have the sovereign right to tax and we preserve that right. We don’t we accept that the sovereign right of Parliament is being arbitrated in foreign courts. Yet, we won’t enforce tax demands based on retrospective change and amount collected to be refunded without interest.”

Revenue secretary Tarun Bajaj stated: “Companies (affected by retrospective tax law) should also be reaching out to us, and try to work out solutions.”

Calling the federal government’s newest transfer a welcome step, famous tax knowledgeable Mukesh Butani stated: “The bill essentially proposes to set May 28, 2012 ( the date when Finance Bill of 2012 was passed by the Parliament approving the retrospective amendment) as the date and tax demands raised prior to that date will stand nullified, subject to conditions such as withdrawal of pending litigation etc.” The consequence of that is that Cairn Energy case which was reopened utilizing the retrospective modification and the reassessment proceedings would stand nullified.

“The second part deals with a situation where as a result of the retrospective law, a demand has created due to application of law as a result of which its tax refund situation has been impacted and the third deals with situations where a demand has arisen on account of withholding tax obligation thrust on the payor of such consideration. The amendments also deals with situations where penalty proceedings have been initiated and they would stand nullified even in situations where demand has been raised”, Butani defined.

Besides, the Bill seeks to ward of any threat posed to taxpayers on account of public curiosity litigation in opposition to the federal government. The conditions coated embrace appeals earlier than the excessive courtroom, Supreme Court and international arbitral award. The invoice supplies that the validation clause insofar because the restoration of demand is anxious will stop to use.

In the Cairn Energy case, even earlier than the arbitral award was pronounced by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, India had seized and bought shares of Cairn in its erstwhile India unit, confiscated dividends and withheld tax refunds totalling Rs 7,600 crore. The Hague courtroom requested the federal government to compensate Cairn “for the total harm suffered” along with curiosity and value of arbitration.

In its order within the Cairn case, three-member tribunal, together with India’s nominee J Christopher Thomas QC, stated the retrospective tax demand was “in breach of the guarantee of fair and equitable treatment”. Affirming its jurisdiction over the case, the tribunal stated the Cairn case was not only a tax-related, however an investment-related dispute. The India authorities’s competition was that tax orders, together with these underneath retrospective legal guidelines, can’t be arbitrated underneath bilateral funding treaties (BITs). Affirming this stance, the federal government introduced in a brand new mannequin BIT in 2016, explicitly excluding tax issues from its purview.

On its half, Cairn has been attempting to get better the sums by attaching and monetising Indian belongings abroad – of late, to New Delhi’s embarrassment, it secured a French courtroom order to grab about 20 Indian authorities properties price Rs 177 crore in Paris. The authorities just lately stated it had roped in a world legislation agency to deal with the enforcement proceedings. An unsuccessful try was earlier made by the federal government to settle the Cairn dispute underneath the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, underneath which the corporate was required to pay round half the quantity due sans curiosity and penalties.

Cairn tax dispute pertains to the occasion the place as a part of an inner rearrangement by means of a agency in European tax haven of Jersey, Cairn UK transferred shares of Cairn India Holdings to Cairn India.

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: