Press "Enter" to skip to content

Facebook Whistleblower Reveals Identity, Says Firm Chooses “Profit Over Safety”

Facebook knew its merchandise have been fueling hate, the whistleblower mentioned. (File)


The whistleblower who shared a trove of Facebook paperwork alleging the social media large knew its merchandise have been fueling hate and harming kids’s psychological well being revealed her id Sunday in a televised interview, and accused the corporate of selecting “profit over safety.”

Frances Haugen, a 37-year-old information scientist from Iowa, has labored for corporations together with Google and Pinterest — however mentioned in an interview with CBS information present “60 Minutes” that Facebook was “substantially worse” than something she had seen earlier than.

She known as for the corporate to be regulated. “Facebook over and over again has shown it chooses profit over safety. It is subsidizing, it is paying for its profits with our safety,” Haugen mentioned.

“The version of Facebook that exists today is tearing our societies apart and causing ethnic violence around the world,” she mentioned.

The world’s largest social media platform has been embroiled in a firestorm led to by Haugen, who as an unnamed whistleblower shared the paperwork with US lawmakers and The Wall Street Journal that element how Facebook knew its merchandise, together with Instagram, have been harming younger women.

In the 60 Minutes interview she defined how the algorithm, which picks what to indicate in a consumer’s News Feed, is optimized for content material that will get a response.

The firm’s personal analysis exhibits that it’s “easier to inspire people to anger than it is to other emotions,” Haugen mentioned.

“Facebook has realized that if they change the algorithm to be safer, people will spend less time on the site, they’ll click on less ads, they’ll make less money.”

During the 2020 US presidential election, she mentioned, the corporate realized the hazard that such content material offered and turned on security methods to scale back it.

But “as soon as the election was over they turn them back off, or they change the settings back to what they were before, to prioritize growth over safety, and that really feels like a betrayal of democracy to me,” she mentioned.

“No one at Facebook is malevolent,” she mentioned, including that the incentives are “misaligned.”

“Facebook makes more money when you consume more content … And the more anger that they get exposed to, the more they interact, the more they consume.”

Haugen didn’t draw a straight line between that call to roll again security methods and US Capitol riot on January 6, although 60 Minutes famous that the social community was utilized by among the organizers of that violence.


Earlier Sunday, Facebook dismissed as “ludicrous” recommendations it contributed to the January 6 riot.

Facebook’s vp of coverage and international affairs Nick Clegg additionally vehemently pushed again on the assertion its platforms are “toxic” for teenagers, days after a tense congressional listening to through which US lawmakers grilled the corporate over its impression on the psychological well being of younger customers.

The New York Times reported Saturday that Clegg sought to pre-empt Haugen’s interview by penning a 1,500-word memo to workers alerting them of the “misleading” accusations.

Clegg pressed the case in an look on CNN.

“I think the assertion (that) January 6th can be explained because of social media, I just think that’s ludicrous,” Clegg instructed the broadcaster, saying it was “false comfort” to consider expertise was driving America’s deepening political polarization.

The accountability for the riot “lies squarely with the people who inflicted the violence and those who encouraged them — including then-president Trump” and others who asserted the election was stolen, he added.


While everybody “has a rogue uncle” or previous classmate whose excessive views could also be seen on Facebook, Clegg reportedly wrote in his memo, “changes to algorithmic ranking systems on one social media platform cannot explain wider societal polarization.”

Facebook has encountered criticism that it fuels societal issues, assaults Clegg mentioned shouldn’t relaxation at Facebook’s ft. But he acknowledged that individuals with pre-existing points might not profit from social media use.

“I don’t think it’s intuitively surprising if you’re not feeling great about yourself already, that then going on to social media can actually make you feel a bit worse,” he instructed CNN.

He additionally disputed reporting in an explosive Wall Street Journal sequence that Facebook’s personal analysis warned of the hurt that photo-sharing app Instagram can do to teen women’ well-being.

“It’s simply not borne out by our research or anybody else’s that Instagram is bad or toxic for all teens,” Clegg mentioned, however added Facebook’s analysis will proceed.

(This story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: