As of noon Tuesday, six males and three girls have been chosen to serve on the jury in the course of the trial in Minneapolis. Of the 9 jurors, 5 are White, two are Black, one is Hispanic and one is combined race, in response to how the court docket says the jurors recognized themselves.
Opening statements are anticipated to start out no sooner than March 29, adopted by testimony that might take about 4 weeks.
Who was chosen
Eric Nelson is questioning the possible jurors for the protection, whereas Steve Schleicher is questioning them for the prosecution. Judge Peter Cahill is presiding over the trial.
Seven jurors had been chosen within the first 4 days of jury choice final week. Two jurors had been chosen on Monday.
The first juror chosen was a White man in his 20s or 30s who works as a chemist and mentioned he has an analytical thoughts.
The second juror was a girl of shade who seems to be in her 20s or 30s, in response to a pool reporter’s observations in court docket. She mentioned she was “super excited” about getting the jury questionnaire type.
The third juror chosen was a White man in his 30s who works as an auditor.
The fourth juror was a White man in his late 30s or 40s who mentioned he had a “very favorable” view of Black Lives Matter. He additionally mentioned he believed police are extra truthful than different witnesses. The juror is planning to get married on May 1 and instructed the court docket that if he was chosen for the trial it may delay the marriage.
“Go ahead and throw me under the bus with your fiancée,” the choose joked. The juror replied, “OK, I will do that.”
The fifth juror chosen was a Black man in his 30s or 40s who moved to the US 14 years in the past and works in data know-how. He mentioned that he had a “somewhat negative” opinion of Chauvin, that he strongly disagreed with defunding the police and that police make him really feel protected.
The sixth juror was a Hispanic man in his 20s or 30s, in response to the pool reporter’s observations. The man, who works as a truck driver, mentioned Chauvin “gave me the impression of showing off his authority” within the video of Floyd’s dying, and he additionally mentioned none of this may have occurred if Floyd had complied with police.
The seventh juror is a White lady in her 50s, in response to the court docket. She mentioned she has a “somewhat negative” impression of Chauvin, and believes there are biases towards African Americans however not everybody within the system is dangerous. She mentioned she felt empathy for Floyd in addition to the officers as a result of “at the end of the day I’m sure that the intention was not there for this to happen.”
The eighth juror chosen is a Black man in his 30s, in response to the court docket, who mentioned he had very favorable views of Black Lives Matter. He additionally mentioned he thought Chauvin had “no intention” of harming anybody, however he mentioned he may put that opinion apart on this case.
The ninth juror chosen is a White lady in her 50s, in response to the court docket. She had a “somewhat negative” impression of Chauvin and wrote she “got the impression he didn’t care about” Floyd.
Who was excused
If the protection or prosecution believes an individual can’t be neutral within the case, they will ask the court docket to dismiss the individual for trigger. Each facet has limitless challenges for trigger.
Prosecutors and protection attorneys can even transfer to dismiss potential jurors with out trigger, utilizing what’s referred to as a peremptory problem. Chauvin’s crew is allowed 15 of those challenges and the prosecution has 9. These peremptory challenges can themselves be challenged, although, if they’re based mostly on race, ethnicity or intercourse — often called a Batson problem.
The protection has used 11 peremptory strikes and the prosecution has used 5 as of Tuesday.
The protection has typically used its strikes on individuals who expressed detrimental views of Chauvin and constructive views of Black Lives Matter, whereas the prosecution has typically used its strikes on White individuals who expressed help for police.
The potential juror had a “very negative” impression of Chauvin and wrote in his questionnaire that “George Floyd had been murdered by police officers.”
He instructed the court docket he may apply the presumption of innocence, however “it’s a really tough thing for me to do.”
While the protection used a peremptory problem on the person, after the lunch break they requested for the strike to be returned and for the choose to strike the juror for trigger.
Nelson, the protection lawyer, mentioned the choose ought to method any potential juror who is aware of in regards to the settlement settlement or pre-trial plea settlement discussions from a place of prejudice.
Prosecutor Steve Schleicher responded that the fear over the $27 million settlement is overblown, and the protection is asking the choose to presume the potential jurors are mendacity.
While Judge Cahill mentioned he wouldn’t return the protection strike, he additionally would not disregard what a juror says just because they use the “magic words” that they are often truthful and neutral.
CNN’s Brad Parks and Carma Hassan contributed to this report.