Press "Enter" to skip to content

Attempt To “Implicate” Aryan Khan, Anti-Drugs Agency Says

Aryan Khan Drugs Case: SIT Officials discovered “grave irregularities” in probe performed by NCB

New Delhi:

The Narcotics Control Bureau or NCB workforce that arrested Aryan Khan and 19 others within the Mumbai drugs-on-cruise case did a “shoddy” probe and the particular investigation workforce or SIT created to re-investigate the case discovered “grave irregularities” of their motion.

The irregularities included not conducting necessary medical check of the accused, no video recording of the raids or no corroborative proof towards WhatsApp chats.

Narcotics Control Bureau director common SN Pradhan advised Press Trust of India that it was a case of “underwhelming evidence” as in comparison with the golden precept of gathering “overwhelming evidence” towards the accused.

The NCB additionally mentioned in a press release it utilized “the touchstone of the principle of proof beyond reasonable doubt” whereas re-probing this case.

Officials from the particular investigation workforce discovered the NCB workforce did many “grave irregularities” and had been allegedly simply attempting to “implicate” Aryan Khan on this case, reported Press Trust of India.

The NCB on Friday filed an almost 6,000-page cost sheet earlier than a Mumbai courtroom towards 14 accused on this case of 2021 even because it didn’t cost six, together with Aryan Khan, on account of “lack of sufficient evidence.”

The cost sheet has various annexures like reveals of various WhatsApp chats, statements of witnesses and accused and different technical particulars with the operative portion being about 400 pages.

The courtroom is predicted to take its cognisance quickly.

“The SIT found there was neither an intent to act nor there was actual act by those who have not been charged. We, however, have physical evidence in the case of the 14 accused,” Mr Pradhan mentioned.

Those not named or given a clear chit within the cost sheet, filed underneath numerous sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS), embrace Aryan Khan, Samir Sehgal, Manav Singhal, Bhaskar Arora, Gopal Ji Anand and Avin Sahu.

The accused named within the cost sheet are Vikrant Chokkar, Mohak Jaswal, Ishmeet S Chadha, Gomit Chopra, Abdul Kadar Shaikh, Shreyas Surendra Nair, Manish Rajgarhia, Chinedu Igwe, Shivraj R Harijan, Nupur Satija, Okoro Uzeoma, Arbaaz Merchant, Mummun Dhamecha and Aachit Kumar.

These 14, based on NCB officers, have been charged by-and-large underneath sections that take care of consumption/possession of small portions of medication and conspiracy underneath the anti-narcotics legislation. These offences carry a punishment of about one yr, officers mentioned.

NCB officers mentioned there have been gaps in probe at just about each stage of this case as they mentioned “similar sections” of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act had been put towards all of them whereas rounding them off from the cruise.

Like within the case of Avin Sahu, the NCB officer mentioned, the accused had no medicine on his individual however he “admitted” to have consumed medicine however then no medical check was performed to corroborate that.

In the case of Mohak Jaiswal, no medicine had been discovered from him however it was discovered throughout SIT investigation that he “procured drugs” for his buddies. Mr Jaiswal, therefore, has been chargesheeted.

The SIT additionally let off 4 of the cruise organisers because it went by way of the “contract” that they had inked for organising the cruise occasion and it was discovered that they had been solely chargeable for occasion administration and had no data about different issues together with private frisking of the individuals.

“We have filed the charge sheet on the basis of whatever was found by our special investigation team on the last date of filing the charge sheet,” Mr Pradhan mentioned.

He added that no “corroborative evidence” might be discovered towards Aryan and 5 others who’ve been let off.

Asked if this was the top of the probe within the case or will there be a supplementary cost sheet, the DG mentioned, “as of now you can say, yes, the investigation is done but there are all possibilities in case some fresh set of facts come to light.”

Talking in regards to the function of Aryan Khan, who spent 26 days in jail earlier than getting bail within the case, NCB deputy director common (operations) and SIT chief Sanjay Kumar Singh mentioned the “basic premise” that his good friend (Arbaaz Merchant) was carrying medicine for him has not been confirmed and was discovered to be “fallacious”.

“His friend (Arbaaz Merchant) denied that he carried drugs for Aryan Khan. In fact, he told the SIT that Aryan Khan had told him that no drugs should be brought on the cruise as NCB was very active,” Mr Singh mentioned.

He mentioned no proof was discovered towards Aryan Khan to corroborate that he both consumed, procured or was in any conspiracy, together with worldwide linkages with regard to narcotics, and therefore the fees towards him don’t stand authorized scrutiny.

While there was no proof towards Aryan within the present case, the cost sheet, based on officers, mentions his assertion the place he accepted “smoking ganja (cannabis)” and “doing charas” prior to now.

The company has additionally discovered his cellphone chats the place he’s speaking about some medicine along with his buddies earlier, officers mentioned.

The SIT head mentioned “no medical examination” was performed by the NCB workforce after arresting him to show if he consumed medicine.

He added “no videography” was performed by the NCB workforce, underneath its then Mumbai zonal director Sameer Wankhede, of the raids performed by the company on the Cordelia cruise on the night time of October 2-Three final yr.

The SIT additionally discovered all of the accused weren’t basically inter-connected and so bracketed them underneath 6-7 sub-groups within the cost sheet defining their restricted roles.

Mr Singh mentioned Aryan Khan’s cellphone was seized however “legal procedures were not followed” whereas opening it, including “Right from the start the seizure of the mobile phone was questionable.”

He mentioned the assertion of the witness who died on this case Prabhakar Sail was recorded by the SIT and he advised them that he was “made to sign on blank papers” and he didn’t see the medicine seizure on the cruise. Mr Sail had made allegations that NCB officers had been in all probability trying to extort some cash from Aryan’s household in return for saving him.

The NCB known as him hostile earlier than he died in April. The reason for his demise was reported to be a coronary heart assault.

Another witness of the case who’s in jail at current in a Maharashtra police case, Kiran Gosavi, supported the NCB motion that was undertaken on that day in October, he mentioned.

When requested if any motion can be taken towards the then Mumbai workforce headed by Sameer Wankhede, Mr Pradhan mentioned “we cannot immediately jump to accuse the Mumbai unit…they must have had something and to probe this there is another SIT.”

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    %d bloggers like this: